Zoological Family Names

edit

These are normally formed from the (Latin) genitive stem of the name of the type genus + idae (the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature specifically says so). There are exceptions for established older names, and there are numerous cases where the name of the type genus has changed after the family name was published, but it's a good idea to take this as the default. As a result, I suspect most of the etymologies you've been adding are incorrect, though mostly from leaving out a link in the chain rather than getting the ultimate sources wrong. In other words, they should say from xxx, the name of the type genus, (from yyyyy) + -idae, where "from yyyyy" is your present etymology. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

While I'm at it, I should give you our welcome template, too:

Welcome

edit

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Chuck Entz (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Arctiidae

edit

Could you provide a reference for saying that a moth genus derives its name from Greek for "bear", rather than, for example Greek/Latin for a plant thought to be Inula candida. If you don't have a reference, it would probably take researching the original genus description. DCDuring TALK 02:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Without looking anything up, I would say that it's at least plausible: the caterpillars of several species in the Arctiidae are known as woolly bears because of the long hairs that give them a round and furry appearance. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:27, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
There is no use in Google Books of "wooly bear" before 1815 when Arctides seems to have been named by Leach. Is "woolly bear" a calque of something? I've put in trreq's in a few languages at woolly bear in hopes that we can turn up something. DCDuring TALK 04:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Here's the reference for Arctiidae, it's from the Century Dictionary: http://www.micmap.org/dicfro/previous/century-dictionary/300/1/arctiidae . I'll add it to the Arctiidae page next.
That satisfies the reference need, but I wonder about the truth of the reference. MWOnline gives 1841 for the first use of "woolly bear". DCDuring TALK 04:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply