Talk:䯂
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Suzukaze-c in topic Just leaving this here
RfV February 2013 edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Japanese. Tagged in this edit. - -sche (discuss) 07:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- By one point of view, any Chinese character could conceivably be Japanese as well. However, this particular character is not listed in the List of non-Jōyō characters; it is not listed in Jim Breen's online kanji dictionary (you'll have to copy-paste, I cannot link directly); it is not listed as having a Japanese reading in the Unihan database of characters. Unless someone can cite this, I'd say this is bogus.
- FWIW, my cursory search for citations found exactly zip for google books:"䯂" は (adding the は helps filter for Japanese), and presumably 8,000+ hits across the rest of the web, but mostly moji-bake or scannos by my estimation. The topmost hit that's actually in real Japanese claims that this character is included in the JIS X 0213 character encoding scheme, but the non-Jōyō list linked above is supposedly that same scheme, and it doesn't include this character. Neither does the official Japanese government list of non-Jōyō characters, where this kanji would presumably fall between numbers 513 and 514 in the list.
- Weblio's entry from KANJIDIC only lists a Chinese reading, with an explicit note that "this character isn't used much in Japanese".
- Delete, unless someone can cite it. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 21:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Failed. — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Just leaving this here edit
- Family Register Unified Characters (戸籍統一文字) 511040 - in JIS2004
- [1] - in the Adobe-Japan-1 character set
- Groups listed at the bottom of [2]: "GlyphWiki:JISとIVD-2面93区", "グループ:ExtA日本提案字"
- Also, Unihan can be unreliable at times: weird glosses ("marmoset") and on/kun/Korean readings given to characters that are clearly simplified Chinese