Talk:Agrinion
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion edit
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Attributive-use citations (or evidence of other reason to keep). DCDuring TALK 13:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - "all words in all languages" SemperBlotto 16:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- If nobody cites it in attributive use, delete unless and until CFI is changed to permit place names under other criteria. Equinox ◑ 16:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- RFV passed: clearly in widespread use. Attribute-use rule is obsolete now per Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Names of specific entities. This term easily passed the attestation criterion, hence it is not a subject of RFV. The term could be sent to RFD, but I cannot recommend that. The entry has some translations; it only needs pronunciation added to meet the new regulations for geographic names. --Dan Polansky 09:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
RFV passed, per Dan Polansky. (I'm not actually convinced that this counts as "clearly widespread use" — I'd never heard of it until now — but in more than a month since his comment, no one objected. If anyone wishes to demand citations, feel free to re-list it here.) —RuakhTALK 17:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. I'm more or less ignoring the fact that he wrote "RFV passed" in bold and struck out the section-header, because he didn't de-tag the entry or anything. —RuakhTALK 17:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)