Talk:ablütofobi
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion — failed
RFV discussion — failed edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
since we don't have ablutophobia, why this? -- Prince Kassad 12:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- We lack ablutophobia because it's citeless, not because it's inherently bad. If it had cites, it'd be fine. So I think we can treat this discussion as a standard foreign-word RFV rather than one in which "since we don't have ablutophobia, why this?" is an argument that needs answering.—msh210℠ 22:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- In which case, cites don't find themselves but need to be found. -- Prince Kassad 04:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 20:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)