Talk:abvolution
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Request for verification
Request for verification edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Sounds legitimate, but can anybody cite it? Equinox ◑ 02:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- The term, in this text from 1813, is actually advolution. Mike Halterman 02:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- We are missing the term advolution, both a Webster's 1913 sense or some contemporary biological sense. But "advolution" is revolving towards and this says it is revolving away from. DCDuring TALK 18:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 16:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)