Talk:active

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Spreaderofwords in topic RFC discussion: October 2011–November 2017

RFV discussion: February–April 2017 edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Needs attestation. Not listed in the Duden. --Bruno413 (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Duden is far away from containing all German words, and it's easily attested, e.g. simply doing a google books search for "active gebraucht" (= used actively). -Wilhelm-231 (talk) 05:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Also archaic then? I don't find an attestation newer than 1800. --Bruno413 (talk) 08:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I find younger usages but they're from the 19th century (e.g. 1808, 1843, 1859). Feel free to add a label if you want. -Wilhelm-231 (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'm not familiar with Wiktionary yet to know what labels or categories are appropriate here. Maybe someone can do it who is more experienced? It's definitely a spelling that is no longer used or considered to be correct. --Bruno413 (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Done. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


RFC discussion: October 2011–November 2017 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Webster entry. Definitions need formatting. Synonyms and Antonyms need to be associated with definitions rather than numbers. -- Liliana 12:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


Return to "active" page.