Talk:griffon-vulture
Latest comment: 9 years ago by DCDuring in topic RFV discussion: March 2015
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Attributive form? --Type56op9 (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Cited as a general-purpose alternative form. (spelling noun+noun compounds with hyphens is not unusual.) - -sche (discuss) 16:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- This was entered as an adjective. The quotes are for noun > I changed the POS to noun. --Hekaheka (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hadn't noticed that the header was incorrect. (Even if this were attested a an attributive form, the header should till have been Noun, so I just assumed it was. Inattentional blindness.) - -sche (discuss) 00:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Do we have any kind of template and/or category for noun attributive forms? If it weren't for the possibility that many of these are unattested, this seems like it might be more of a matter for rfc. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- These entries use Template:attributive form of. It doesn't categorize. User:-sche/attributive is a list of pages which transclude that template and contain a hyphen. - -sche (discuss) 02:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is a dvandva compound, different in kind from the ones that have a modifier-noun structure. DCDuring TALK 12:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- These entries use Template:attributive form of. It doesn't categorize. User:-sche/attributive is a list of pages which transclude that template and contain a hyphen. - -sche (discuss) 02:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Do we have any kind of template and/or category for noun attributive forms? If it weren't for the possibility that many of these are unattested, this seems like it might be more of a matter for rfc. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hadn't noticed that the header was incorrect. (Even if this were attested a an attributive form, the header should till have been Noun, so I just assumed it was. Inattentional blindness.) - -sche (discuss) 00:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- This was entered as an adjective. The quotes are for noun > I changed the POS to noun. --Hekaheka (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)