Talk:monocardian

Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: May–October 2012

RFV discussion: May–October 2012

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Rfv-sense - having a single heart.

Could we have some citations please (I could only find the title of a book on a quick look). SemperBlotto (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC) (p.s. Is Dr Who bicardian or dicardian?)Reply

I think it should be tagged rare, (~4 independent uses in nearly 200 years) but I've dug up a few uses:
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2959: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2959: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2959: Parameter 1 is required.
That said, I think these are referring to the second definition, having a single ventricle. As far as I'm aware, no creature exists with two separate hearts (though it's not necessarily impossible) and outside science fiction, this sense is unlikely to exist - I did find a few Doctor Who fanfics that talked about monocardial people. Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
According to WP hagfishes have 2. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 20:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Learn something new every day! Incidentally, the most common term for two hearted seems to be bicardial, with use in both textbooks and Doctor Who novels. Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
RFV-fails, right? - -sche (discuss) 22:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "monocardian" page.