Talk:surprize
Latest comment: 1 month ago by J3133 in topic References
Not a Misspelling
editThis is a long establish'd variant spelling of surprise, see Merriam-Webster, surprize. --AnWulf ... Ferþu Hal! (talk) 18:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Citation with misleading year
editThe noun cite of "2011, William Francis Patrick Napier, quoting Charle Napier, 1813" stresses the 2011, when the text is from 1813. The template is so complex I can't see an easy way to improve it. Equinox ◑ 01:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Smuconlaw Could you sort this out? DTLHS (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- @DTLHS, Equinox, seems you guys have sorted it out yourselves. — SMUconlaw (talk) 08:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
References
editThe sole reference cited is Merriam-Webster. But, unlike Wiktionary, M-W doesn't claim that the spelling is non-standard. — This unsigned comment was added by 31.192.197.247 (talk) at 22:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC).
- I have added a reference to the OED. J3133 (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)