Request for verification
Last modified on 16 March 2010, at 22:40
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Verb? Was it really, or just a poetic nonce somewhere? --Connel MacKenzie 13:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- b.g.c. suggests that vigo(u)red (“vigo(u)rous, invigorated, having vigo(u)r”) did exist, but I'm not finding too many uses as a real verb; and the uses that I do find don't seem to have this sense. (I'm really not sure what's up with them.) Still, it's in a few dictionaries — we got it from vigor in Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, G. & C. Merriam, 1913 — so it probably warrants fuller examination. —RuakhTALK 16:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
RFV failed, verb section removed. —RuakhTALK 16:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)