Talk:vis

Latin declension?

I was quite surprised to see rōboris and rōbori as cases for vīs; according to WWW they are actually part of the declension of rōbur, and according to [www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelatinlibrary.com%2Flivius%2Flivy4notes.pdf&ei=lsE-Sv75JaK-NOK-pakO&usg=AFQjCNES_J9o3ibrux25QNksGpHJne12kQ&sig2=BM1N8APS26hy3GwRzG7LSA] there are no genitive and dative for vīs... what's going on here? Bbi5291 23:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

They were added some time ago be an IP editor. These forms are not supported in any of the published books I've checked, and I don't know where they come from. --EncycloPetey 23:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Strangely enough, viris is in the tabel as well, what's that doing there? Also, wikipedia is spam-blocking the link above, I sadly have to remove the hyperlink.84.84.50.147