Talk:zA

Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFV

RFV edit

See Wiktionary:Requests for verification archive/2012‎#zA. - -sche (discuss) 20:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: February–March 2012 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


"zeptoampere" is not attestable, from a quick glance. Does zA likewise need attestation?--Prosfilaes 08:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Abbreviations of units of measure are usually more readily attestable than their written out forms. Good luck finding any cites in this particular case, though. -- Liliana 12:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, even observing a zA scientifically would be extremely difficult since they are flowing everywhere, all the time. Do we allow units that "ought to exist", even if they are never used or observed? I suppose we have an entry for fairy! Dbfirs 17:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 21:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "zA" page.