FVS edit

Please must use FVS characters in order to provide correct letter forms under the Unicode standards creating Manchu lemmas. Please use templates (of inheriting, derivation, etc.) with correct language codes. 请别敲与语言无关的话。谢谢。 LibCae (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@LibCae 谢谢阁下的提醒,我以后会注意的,实在抱歉过了这么长时间才回复您的信息。这几天我和用户User:TongcyDai在中文维基百科上讨论创建满文的词条是否应该使用自由选择变体符FVS,对方认为不需要使用FVS。刚才我咨询了对Unicode熟悉的友人,对方说为了字符的标准,不需要加FVS,援引对方的话说理论上按照最新的标准,默认情况都是需要正常变形的,不用加任何FVS。这一点我以前也没有意识到,建议按照不加FVS的版本输入。--MiiCii (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
现在看来这样确实是没错的!我们只是需要等待一个正确显示字形的 Noto 无衬线字体。请原谅我之前一直没有找到合适的线上语气来沟通。谢谢!我感到惭愧并希望尽到自己更多的努力。:) LibCae (talk) 06:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
没事的,您太客气了。相信随着时间的推移和技术的进步,满文字体的问题能够得到解决。祝阁下编安。--MiiCii (talk) 07:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MiiCii: 抱歉打扰您了,我想请问一下这是否意味着,ᡶ᠋ᠣᠨᠵᡳᠮᠪᡳ应当移动回ᡶᠣᠨᠵᡳᠮᠪᡳ,与此同时不必再使用重定向,并且以后所有含有fi, fu, fo组合的满文单词,都不必使用FVS1来使字符f正确变形了?--跳跳猫 (talk) 07:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@跳跳猫: 您好,您说的很对。以后对于含fi, fu, fo组合的满文单词,没有必要再使用FVS1了。--MiiCii (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

FVS-2 edit

Per the discussion in beer parlour back in January/February, I don't think we should be using FVS characters for Manchu. RcAlex36 (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have read the discussion you mentioned above. Maybe we should enlarge the number of Manchu lemmas first and discuss about the using of FVS characters afterwards.MiiCii (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@RcAlex36 Thank you for your attention, you've got a point there. It is not necessary to use FVS for Manchu script.--MiiCii (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spamming people's talk pages edit

Please note that people's Babel boxes will tell you what languages they know. You don't need to leave the same message on lots of people's talk pages who clearly don't know the languages you're interested in. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 17:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ᡤᡳᠰᡠᠨ edit

I believe you should not delete that example sentence.

It is short, natural, has a clear context, and uses no additional jargon. The meaning of this sentence is also inoffensive—it is not surprising if a native Manchu speaker uttered this sentence.

If you insist that this sentence should not appear in Wiktionary, as an mnc-3 user, please at least add another example sentence (or a quotaion) that meets the criteria. --TongcyDai (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have understood what you said and I am going to recall my edition. Thank you for your attention. MiiCii (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply