Voting on: This vote is to determine the minimum number of edits needed for a vote to count, on en.wiktionary.org's WT:VOTE pages. Previously, there was no limit at all, only a guideline of 50 edits (waived for visiting sister-language Wiktionary contributors.)
OpposeMGSpiller 22:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC) a significant edit count on other wikimedia projects should be sufficient, perhaps 50 on a sister wiktionary, 100 on a wikipedia / wikibook etc. (I seem to recall that I jumped straight in)MGSpiller22:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain: Since we don't have a voting policy or a consensus on one yet, it doesn't quite make sense to me to vote on the edit minimum. —scs13:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Are we including anonymous user accounts with 50 edits in this, or only Users with named accounts? The draft as it stands includes anonymous accounts, which could mean multiple people connecting through the same address. I would support if we limit the 50 edits to created named User accounts, and provided that the 50 edits were somehow meaningful (i.e. not random plagiariam or vandalism). --EncycloPetey17:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly don't know. I started this vote mainly as a test that the submit buttons were working as expected...and people started voting while I was still mucking about. Perhaps someone could restart this vote with all the various clarifications? Weren't all comments supposed to go on the talk page? --Connel MacKenzie 21:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC) Well, people have started voting: no real point in discouraging participation, at this point. --Connel MacKenzie09:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's an important clarification. This does not apply to anonymous IPS. Anonymous users are just that, anonymous. Users who want to be active in the community must attach a label by which their contributions can be recognized. DAVilla21:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]