Obviously it is not two entries. Those two entries are already done. It is ridiculous to think he wants to use a bot to edit two entries that he has already finished with. If you don’t understand what his examples mean, why don’t you ask him? —Stephen(Talk)08:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeDan Polansky 09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I don't like this. The bot's purpose is likely to add interwiki links, but this is not explicitly stated in the vote. Furthermore, "first edit after update" referred to in the "Abstain" section below is one in Wikipedia. Moreover, this bot's name looks like the bot is about to destroy something while perishing itself in the process ;). We have Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) for interwiki, so we have no urgent need to add another bot for this. --Dan Polansky09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In that failed vote, there was only one vote. It doesn’t mean anything. On English Wikipedia, KamikazeBot seems to be making about 500 edits a day, about twice as many as Luckas-bot. —Stephen(Talk)10:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]