Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2006-08/User:BD2412 for admin

He is a sound contributor, able to make judgment calls and is keen to help. (And boy do we need it!). As for his actions; res ipsa loquitur. Need I say more? Andrew massyn 06:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Acceptance: I had planned on not thinking about it for a few more months, but I am honored to be nominated, and I accept. Time zone is EST/EDT: UTC-5/UTC-4 (depending on daylight savings); en, fr-1, zh-CN-1. And thanks for including my background color in the header. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support:
  1. Support - fantabulous on Wikipedia, equally good here. Give him the mop! —Celestianpower háblame 17:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. support as Connel said, I too checked the list... Kipmaster 18:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Widsith 18:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Damn, Andrew beat me to it. — Vildricianus 09:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. —Stephen 09:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jonathan Webley 11:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I'm very tempted to oppose this, for the same reason I didn't nominate you last month (coincidently, the same reason I didn't nominate the month before last month.) That is, get back to work on that XXX case! The internet needs a dark corner where all that crap can be swept to. (As far as this user's excellent en.wiktionary.org contributions, I'm delighted to regularly see these insightful edits.) --Connel MacKenzie 16:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, we are at what might be characterized as a lull in the case... everything is fully briefed and we are waiting for a ruling which may come down in a few weeks or in several months. So, I'm working on other (less exciting) stuff... ho-hum corporate IP audits and the like. Which is why I had time to tussle with vandals this morning. bd2412 T 22:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. DAVilla 04:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. \Mike 21:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --SemperBlotto 21:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: