Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Logomaniac for admin

User:Logomaniac for admin edit

Support edit

  1.   Support Mglovesfun (talk) 10:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support despite her age and annoying über-niceness :) --Vahagn Petrosyan 10:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    sorry about that ....... :) L☺g☺maniac chat? 14:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support - Yes, I have seen her repair vandalism several times in the past SemperBlotto 11:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support Yair rand 12:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. support very nice in the chat, and does a lot of good wiki work too -- Prince Kassad 13:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Volants 13:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC) No problems[reply]
  7.   Support Conrad.Irwin 14:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC
  8.   Support despite her people skills and general niceness, which put our culture at risk. DCDuring TALK 14:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    (>_>) L☺g☺maniac chat? 14:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support Only reason I could think of to oppose would be to avoid a unanimous vote. ;) -- Carolina wren discussió 15:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support, albeit with the same reservations as Vahagn and DC. :-) -- Visviva 16:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support Razorflame 22:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC) No problems here, even with the current reservations from other users. Razorflame 22:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support, unreservedly. bd2412 T 00:14, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support Tohru 00:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support Equinox 14:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC) I am usually wary of having young (school-age) admins, as they can be misdirected and over-emotional, but I have only seen sound judgement from Logomaniac. Equinox 14:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just as long as no one gives me Coke, (pop, soda, whatever) I'm pretty good ... L☺g☺maniac chat? 17:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Leo Laursen - (talk * contribs) 14:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Pharamp 19:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Supportblurpeace (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support --Internoob (TalkCont.) 21:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support.​--msh210 16:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support Ƿidsiþ 17:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC) Yep, looks good.[reply]
  21.   Support --RuakhTALK 13:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support Bequw¢τ 01:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support --Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC) (My only reservation is that LM's unbalanced use of ) messes with my syntax highlighting; if I may suggest that she balance this by either expanding her palette of moods - :( - or give equal opportunity to her sinister side - (:. Alternatively, (^.-) is balanced. In all other respects, seems excellent ;-).).[reply]
  24.   Support Sure. :) 50 Xylophone Players talk 21:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support Ultimateria 23:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Neskaya contribs - talk? 19:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Absolutely. --Neskaya contribs - talk? 19:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Vote already ended -- Prince Kassad 19:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC) I noticed. Was about to strike it myself. --Neskaya contribstalk? 20:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

Decision edit

25-0-0. What a support. -- Prince Kassad 19:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]