Wiktionary : Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin
User:Nbarth as a local English Wiktionary Administrator . Friendly, willing to learn and discuss. Tools could make him do what he's doing, only better (his words not mine) Rising Sun 19:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote ends: 24:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Acceptance: I accept, thank you!
Languages: en, fr, es-2, ja-1
Timezone: UTC-8/UTC-7 (summer) (Pacific Time ) —Nils von Barth (nbarth ) (talk ) 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
(contribs ) Support --Ruakh TALK 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak support : I haven't interacted with Nbarth, but the contributions look good. Equinox ◑ 21:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support . Have seen this user around a lot, always doing useful things. Kind of thought he was an admin. -- Visviva 00:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Benevolent contributor, has done a lot of nice work on etymology-related guideline pages (WT:ETY , W:AJ/E etc.) --Ivan Štambuk 09:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Very helpful. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 18:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support EncycloPetey 03:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Yes. --Neskaya contribs – talk? 01:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support –blurpeace (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC) - Seems good. Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Volants 13:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Seems solid. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Abstain While I haven't seen Nbarth in action for a while, I would have opposed at that point. A quick scan of contributions doesn't reveal many areas in which having extra tools would be useful; though that's always a chicken-and-egg problem. Conrad .Irwin 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ] Abstain - doesn't ever seem to have repaired vandalism or done anything similar SemperBlotto 11:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Abstain per SemperBlotto. I cannot find that many instances in which having the extra tools would be beneficial to the English Wiktionary after quickly scanning this users' most recent contributions. Ra z or fl ame 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
edit
Support --RuakhTALK 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Abstain While I haven't seen Nbarth in action for a while, I would have opposed at that point. A quick scan of contributions doesn't reveal many areas in which having extra tools would be useful; though that's always a chicken-and-egg problem. Conrad.Irwin 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)