Citations:Usenetian
English citations of Usenetian
Adjective: "of or pertaining to Usenet"
edit1992 1994 1999 | |||||||
ME « | 15th c. | 16th c. | 17th c. | 18th c. | 19th c. | 20th c. | 21st c. |
- 1999 January 4, reas...@my-dejanews.com, “Scientific Naturalism and Culture Wars”, in alt.atheism[3] (Usenet), retrieved 2023-03-21:
- In typical Usenetian fashion, there were a host of replies, many quite thoughtful, which raised a number of issues and contested a number of points. I was particularly gratified by the degree to which these replies compelled me to think more deeply about the issues. I hope to eventually continue dialogue regarding a number of those issues.
Noun: "a user of Usenet"
edit1994 2000 2001 2002 2013 | |||||||
ME « | 15th c. | 16th c. | 17th c. | 18th c. | 19th c. | 20th c. | 21st c. |
- 2001 March 13, Dave Hillstrom, “RubberPants”, in alt.pizza.delivery.drivers[6] (Usenet), retrieved 2023-03-21:
- >You failed to answer the question, David.
you're right. i didn't answer it, did i. and now the moment is gone. my one chance to "bond" with this fellow usenetian. a lost opportunity. the closeness that could have been. my soul weeps.
- 2001 March 13, Ann Keitz, “Shouldn't Enterprise posts be in rec.arts.sf.tv?”, in rec.arts.tv[7] (Usenet), retrieved 2023-03-21:
- >> who does he think he is, Dan Tropea or something?
>
>I've heard the name, but don't know him. Is he nazi-like, as one poster suggested you were acting?
He was an infamous Usenetian who insisted on inappropriately crossposting to groups to "spread discussion" and had his own warped logic to justify it. You seem to be channeling him.
- 2013 August 15, Mike L, “Pondhopping again – punctuation in business correspondence”, in alt.usage.english[9] (Usenet), retrieved 2023-03-21:
- No, no, no! Fellow-Usenetians are not strangers. As for the artefactive "L", only Lazza is intimate enough to be alowed to call me "Mr L" - it goes with the head-dress, I believe.