English citations of ad rem

  • 1998 November 26, "Witt" <witt omega.com>, "Re: Ban abpep-t and you'll put kids at risk", message-ID <XBk72.713$Cm.190745@newscene.newscene.com>, alt.activism.children, Usenet [1]:
    Your choice of words and punctuation, and style of rhetoric (or rather lack of it) show that you are not prepared to consider the arguments ad rem, but merely resort to ad hominem attacks.