Talk:塗糜胿

Source

In 闽南方言大词典 p. 1139, it gives thô͘-bêr-ku, but in 永春方言志 p. 146, thô͘-bêr-kui. Mar vin kaiser (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Mar vin kaiser: I suspect it's a typo in 闽南方言大词典. 永春县志 writes it as 涂糜胿 and gives the pronunciation t'ɔ bə kui. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 21:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Justinrleung Makes sense, let's remove thô͘-bêr-ku. Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@Justinrleung Oh wait! The alternative form. Why is it 龜. Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@Justinrleung Given that the character choice in 闽南方言大词典 p. 1139 is 龜, it kinda means that they really intended for the syllable to be "ku", right? Mar vin kaiser (talk) 02:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@Mar vin kaiser: I think 闽南方言大词典 looked at the 龟 in some Yongchun source like 永春方言志 and thought it was ku. (龟 has both ku and kui readings, but ku might be more common since it's a vernacular reading.) — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 04:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)