Talk:๐Œผ๐Œด๐Œบ๐Œด๐Œน๐ƒ

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 92.218.236.161

If this is a hapax, the conclusion of the usage note is baseless. It could just as well have meant exactly the same as "hairus". If there were two attestations with the same sense it would still be a very weak basis, but one is perfectly meaningless. 92.218.236.161 00:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Return to "๐Œผ๐Œด๐Œบ๐Œด๐Œน๐ƒ" page.