Talk:Tonto

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Liliana-60 in topic Tonto

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Tonto edit

Defined solely as "Sidekick of the Lone Ranger". I didn't think we included entries like this? Thryduulf (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have reworked the entry and converted the rfd to an RfD sense. As a demonym it would stay, I think. I have added a probably attestable but debatable common noun sense: "sidekick". I am not sure that this really warrants inclusion, but it seems to me to warrant consideration for inclusion. Please tag it if you think it debatable. DCDuring TALK 17:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've not tagged it as such, but the noun sense certainly merits verification. An admittedly quick look on bgc turned up a couple of mentions and no uses. Thryduulf (talk) 00:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I found another sense. Take a look at the cites for both common noun senses. DCDuring TALK 01:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes those all look good. Although you have what looks to be a typo in the final quote for the sidekick sense (s/nor/not/), but without a url to the book it's not immidately easily checkable. Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Given its figurative uses, I would also keep the marked definition as the at least once clearly well-understood origin. DAVilla 06:34, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
But our current practice is simply to put the origin information in etymology, with a WP link, to provide the basic cultural information that people need to understand the connotations that come with the use of the proper noun. DCDuring TALK 14:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

kept, no consensus for deletion -- Liliana 00:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Tonto" page.