Talk:artificial grammar
RFD
edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
rfc hasn't elicited good def in one year. DCDuring TALK 09:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- The only usage I know of means "bit of made-up language" (a severely reduced, ad hoc construction as opposed to a complete constructed language such as Esperanto or Ido). Made-up language tests are sometimes used to test language-learning ability. The U.S. Government used to use these tests to qualify applicants to the Defense Language Institute. See w:Artificial grammar learning. —Stephen 14:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Looking at th WP stub article and the first 2 pages of the 600+ raw b.g.c. hits, it seems SoP to me, but similar phrases have passed RfD. DCDuring TALK 15:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've replaced the definition and removed rfc, but it still looks SoP to me. DCDuring TALK 16:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see this as SoP any more than artificial intelligence. Since it is used attributively in artificial grammar learning, it should satisfy CFI. I'll try to find a more thorough explanation, since the current definition seems somehow lacking, but I can't articulate quite why I think that. --EncycloPetey 16:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, the current definition simply defines grammar. artificial grammar means "small bit of made-up language, used for testing language-learning ability". —Stephen 17:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. With this definition, not cited and not kept. There's potential later for entry, but this discussion is closed. --Jackofclubs 00:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
RFC: music copyvio
editThis term was discussed on RFC because its definition copied information from a copyrighted source. Please see this discussion. — Beobach 23:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- and other Lerdahl copyright definitions
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) This has since been deleted. — Beobach 22:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) I deleted this with the following summary: "opaque term's copyright violation has not been corrected in three years; if term is valid, create new entry with non-copyrighted definition". — Beobach 22:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) This has since been cleaned up, but may be SoP. — Beobach 22:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) I deleted this with the following summary: "copyright violation has not been corrected in three years; if term is valid, create new entry with non-copyrighted definition". — Beobach 22:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) This has since been cleaned up, at least as far as copyrights are concerned. — Beobach 22:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) I deleted this with the following summary: "opaque term's copyright violation has not been corrected in three years; if term is valid, create new entry with non-copyrighted definition". — Beobach 22:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
As with permutation. — Beobach 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
As with permutation. — Beobach 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I did not nominate this term, I am commenting years later.) I deleted this, as noted above. — Beobach 22:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- The copyright violation has been cleaned up, but the entry remains SoP. I will RFD. — Beobach 22:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
As with permutation. — Beobach 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
As noted in WT:BP#DeLone copyvios?, the music definitions for the above entries contain definitions for which DeLone and Lerdahl hold the copyright. Rod (A. Smith) 05:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- These have now all been dealt with. When I archive this discussion, I will place a link to the oldid of this page, where all of these can be seen (rather than merely archiving the individual section). — Beobach 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The definition makes no sense to me. Needs attention from somebody familiar with this concept. -- WikiPedant 02:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)