Talk:extenuating circumstances

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic extenuating circumstances

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


extenuating circumstances edit

Was a poorly formed IP addition. Was tempted to simply delete as SoP, but thought I'd bring it here for discussion instead to see if people think it is a specific enough legal term to warrant keeping as it is being linked to. — Carolina wren discussió 01:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Keep, commonly used law term, as far as I know. If it doesn't warrant its own entry, an appendix of words related to law should include it. — [ ric ] opiaterein12:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Is it listed in legal dictionaries? Then it passes the lemming test. DAVilla 01:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, in 3 OneLook "legal dictionaries". DCDuring TALK 22:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Keep, however I don't think you can have just one extenuating circumstance, but I'd have said I hear this phrase quite often in a legal/political context. Mglovesfun 22:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've just pressed preview and it's coming up in blue. Crap. Mglovesfun 22:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Is the death of a family member an extenuating circumstance? —Stephen 22:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kept.RuakhTALK 13:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Return to "extenuating circumstances" page.