RfV discussion for English plural of haruspex entry

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


I wager that this erroneous entry stems from an editor’s misunderstanding of haruspex#Latin, wherein the singular genitive, rather than the plural nominative form is listed after the lemma. The correct plural form is haruspices.  (u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 17:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I corrected it. Angr 18:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Clearly an error. Strickenthrough and RFVfailed.  (u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 21:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Kept. See archived discussion of November 2007. 05:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Return to "haruspicis" page.