Talk:illuceo

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Vladbadu in topic Why no perfect?

Why no perfect?

edit

The header of the conjugation table states that it has no perfect, while the references themselves mention “illuxit”, among others. I don’t know whether it has a perfect active indicative in Classical Latin, but it is attested, at the very least, in Late Latin (e.g. Ps. 117:27, “ Deus Dominus, et illuxit nobis”).

Does the Latin Wiktionary have a policy against non-Classical forms or is it just an oversight that I should correct? Vladbadu (talk) 18:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to "illuceo" page.