Talk:locknote
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Goldenrowley in topic locknote
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Formerly Transwiki:Locknote
I found only one Googlebook (book). I wonder if this has enough usage to meet criteria? Goldenrowley 02:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3000 web hits isn't enough to make me think it is in widespread actual use. One would think the term would have found attestable use in conference proceedings on Books or Scholar. That it hasn't may mean it is jargon of conference organisers. DCDuring TALK 11:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think the 3000 hits are mostly for a brand name "LockNote", which makes it harder to divide the "wheat from the chaff", however not impossible. We just need 2 more cites. Goldenrowley 20:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, the noun has 3 citations now, so now we only need to question the verb form. Goldenrowley 06:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
1 sense RFV pass (the noun); 2 senses failed RFV failed(the verb and locknoter.) 2 senses removed. Goldenrowley 22:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)