Talk:obstreperus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:602:980:7790:8DFC:24ED:C566:36BD in topic forms, stems, lemmata

Source for the lengthy commentary?

edit

There are many Latin words in -ero that could've provided the basis for analogy. Notably, moderor is derived from modus (2nd declension, not 3rd), and tolero seems to use -ero like -ito. But even without these two it's unlikely that this word was derived from infinitive rather than from the present stem. 195.187.108.130 19:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

forms, stems, lemmata

edit
This is opposed to the suffixation of the first person present indicative, as is the usual custom when adjectives are created from verbs in Latin

I accept, without understanding, that the first person (singular!) present indicative is the customary key for dictionaries, though this leads to nonsense like “obstrepō [‘I roar’] is Latin for to roar.” But I *ahem* respectfully question the statement that dividō or prōdigō, rather than the stem divid or prōdig, is the base of the derivation of dividus or prōdigus. —2601:602:980:7790:8DFC:24ED:C566:36BD 02:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Return to "obstreperus" page.