Talk:practicioner
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Visviva in topic practicioner
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
By comparative measure, is this "common" enough? --Connel MacKenzie 00:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- My gut feeling is yes, since I didn't recognize it as a misspelling right away. I don't know what the data would say. --EncycloPetey 21:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- By comparative measure, probably not; "practitioner" outnumbers "practicioner" by about 136:1 on Google web, and by about 82:1 on b.g.c. On the other hand that's still 267,000 web hits, and those b.g.c. hits include 11 books with "practicioner(s)" in the title. Scarily enough, that includes volumes published under the names of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the European Commission. So put me down for a weak keep. -- Visviva 15:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)