Derived nouns

edit

Most physicists support the view there cannot be a definition of spacetime before spacetime

edit

Thus we have the protocosmic state (first cosmic state: a mixed state of self-interactions defined using renormalization techniques).

Even if our universe originated from a parent universe, that parent universe isn't actually precosmic to us, but causally connected to us, thus protocosmic with reference to our universe.

There is no true protocosmic state in general. Because there is no first parent universe. For every universe, a parent universe occurs mathematically.

Thus both terms: precosmic and protocosmic, are nonrigorous (the problem is that many silly names became formalized in physics).

Why "a mixed state of self-interactions" can better describe the pre-Big-Bang particle and the black-hole core: The atomic nuclei are in a mixed state of self-interactions. They don't exhibit the correct behavior according to our models, but are close. The pre-Big-Bang state and the black-hole core, are also in a mixed state of self-interactions. We know that for sure, because: degenerate monoquarks are impossible having impermissible interaction numbers, and the chromodynamic (strong force) fluid gives wrong statistics.


see: Have We Solved the Black Hole Information Paradox? - Scientific American Blog Network

Thus a pure state as the black-hole core is more possible. There is no infoloss (loss of information) because it dissipates to a more fundamental level, like a wave may dissipate as atomic and molecular scale turbulence (Yasunori Nomura's simile).

Return to "precosmic" page.