Talk:refundant

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion

RFV discussion

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Appears to be either a scanno or a misspelling. OTOH, given the listed sense, a slight alteration of redundant might be indicative of it being a protologism. Only the fact that the editor who added this also added a good word, acronymize, caused me to not speedy delete it. — Carolina wren discussió 03:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed, entry deleted. Even well-meaning editors make mistakes. —RuakhTALK 01:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Return to "refundant" page.