User:Dghmonwiskos/h₃nóh₁mn̥

Justifications for the reconstruction of *h₁nómn̥ as h₃nóh₁mn̥ edit

Original paradigm edit

Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃néh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
vocative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
accusative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
ablative *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
dative *h₃néh₁m̥ney *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥néy
locative *h₃néh₁mn̥, *h₃néh₁m̥ni *? *h₃n̥h₁mén, *h₃n̥h₁méni
instrumental *h₃néh₁mn̥h₁ *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥néh₁

alternating e/o-grade edit

Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *h₃néh₁mn̥s
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
vocative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
accusative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃néh₁mn̥s
ablative *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃néh₁mn̥s
dative *h₃néh₁m̥ney *? *h₃néh₁m̥ney
locative *h₃néh₁mn̥, *h₃néh₁m̥ni *? *h₃néh₁mn̥, *h₃néh₁m̥ni
instrumental *h₃néh₁mn̥h₁ *? *h₃néh₁mn̥h₁

generalised o-grade edit

Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁mō
genitive *h₃nóh₁mn̥s *h₃nóh₁mn̥s
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
vocative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
accusative *h₃nóh₁mn̥ *h₃nóh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃nóh₁mō
genitive *h₃nóh₁mn̥s *? *h₃nóh₁mn̥s
ablative *h₃nóh₁mn̥s *? *h₃nóh₁mn̥s
dative *h₃nóh₁m̥ney *? *h₃nóh₁m̥ney
locative *h₃nóh₁mn̥, *h₃nóh₁m̥ni *? *h₃nóh₁mn̥, *h₃nóh₁m̥ni
instrumental *h₃nóh₁mn̥h₁ *? *h₃nóh₁mn̥h₁

In the cases of Germanic, Hellenic and Phrygian, the noun declines with a short *o throughout. This can be explained by the fact that, in forms of the paradigm with the sequence *h₃nóh₁m̥n- (as opposed to *h₃nóh₁mn̥), PIE sound laws would delete the laryngeal and lengthen the vowel, leading to a form *h₃nṓmn- appearing in front of endings with a vowel, and the form *h₃nóh₁mn̥ elsewhere. Presumably this would have applied at a PIE level. These particular languages would then apply Osthoff's law (or an equivalent) which would shorten the vowel when preceding a resonant closing the syllable. Thus *h₃nṓmn- > *h₃nómn-. Germanic bases its declension on the original collective form, which, taking into account a generalisation of the o-grade and the sound changes I just described, would provide this paradigm:

  • nominative *h₃nóh₁mō
  • vocative *h₃nóh₁mō
  • accusative *h₃nóh₁mō
  • genitive *h₃nóh₁mn̥s > *h₃nṓmnes > *h₃nómnes
  • dative *h₃nṓmney > *h₃nómney
  • locative *h₃nṓmni > *h₃nómni
  • instrumental *h₃nóh₁mn̥h₁ > *h₃nṓmneh₁ > *h₃nómneh₁

This would be reflected as:

  • nominative *nōmô
  • vocative *nōmô
  • accusative *nōmô
  • genitive *namniz
  • dative *namnī
  • locative *namni
  • instrumental *namnē

After which analogy could conceivably shorten the vowel in the nominative, vocative and accusative endings. A similar sequence of events would presumably have to happen early in Greek and Phrygian's histories, which considering the ubiquitiousness of Osthoff's law in Ancient Greek and the presumed close development of the two languages, is not at all unlikely. Osthoff's law presumably also applied in Armenian and Italic, leading to a similar alternation between long and short o-grades throughout the paradigm. Italic appears to have generalised the long *o from the nomino-accusative, although influence from words like cognōmen (connected with the IE root ǵneh₃-) cannot be discounted. Armenian could have conceivably done the same thing, but it is also possible that the forms simply merged through phonological change, as below:

  • *h₃nóh₁mn̥- > *ənṓmən- > *ənū́wən- > anun- > անուն-
  • *h₃nómn- > *ənómn- > *ənówn- > anown- > անուն-

Both forms would have been written (and presumably pronounced) in the same way.

generalised e-grade? edit

Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₃néh₁mn̥ *h₃néh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *h₃néh₁mn̥s
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₃néh₁mn̥ *h₃néh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
vocative *h₃néh₁mn̥ *h₃néh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
accusative *h₃néh₁mn̥ *h₃néh₁m̥nih₁ *h₃néh₁mō
genitive *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃néh₁mn̥s
ablative *h₃néh₁mn̥s *? *h₃néh₁mn̥s
dative *h₃néh₁m̥ney *? *h₃néh₁m̥ney
locative *h₃néh₁mn̥, *h₃néh₁m̥ni *? *h₃néh₁mn̥, *h₃néh₁m̥ni
instrumental *h₃néh₁mn̥h₁ *? *h₃néh₁mn̥h₁

generalise zero-grade edit

Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₃ń̥h₁mn̥ *h₃ń̥h₁mō
genitive *h₃n̥h₁méns *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₃ń̥h₁mn̥ *h₃ń̥h₁m̥nih₁ *h₃ń̥h₁mō
vocative *h₃ń̥h₁mn̥ *h₃ń̥h₁m̥nih₁ *h₃ń̥h₁mō
accusative *h₃ń̥h₁mn̥ *h₃ń̥h₁m̥nih₁ *h₃ń̥h₁mō
genitive *h₃n̥h₁méns *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
ablative *h₃n̥h₁méns *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥nés
dative *h₃n̥h₁méney *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥néy
locative *h₃n̥h₁mén, *h₃n̥h₁méni *? *h₃n̥h₁mén, *h₃n̥h₁méni
instrumental *h₃n̥h₁ménh₁ *? *h₃n̥h₁m̥néh₁