Nomination: I hereby nominate User:16@r as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He's been very useful with Wikipedia links, etymologies, Latin and French terms and cross-project linking, and has been useful with adding tonnes of templates to various pages. Despite the initial concern about the @ in his username, he's proved a willing contributor. Keene17:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to my above reasons for nominating, I'd like to point out that 16@r is the best user of edit summaries on the whole site, IMHO. They're always concise and correspond perfectly to the edit, showing his thoroughness. --Keene17:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeConnel MacKenzie 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Too much cleanup generated - needs better understanding of formats here. Also, still using grandfathered username; definitely the wrong example to set for newbies. --Connel MacKenzie21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain. Previously this editor would often ignore questions, comments, concerns, etc. on his/her talk-page, or give a vaguely dismissive response. I'd actually vote "Oppose", except that I don't know whether (s)he still does this, and I don't think past misbehavior should permanently disqualify an editor. —RuakhTALK19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Keene 17:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Too much cleanup generated - needs better understanding of formats here. Also, still using grandfathered username; definitely the wrong example to set for newbies. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. Previously this editor would often ignore questions, comments, concerns, etc. on his/her talk-page, or give a vaguely dismissive response. I'd actually vote "Oppose", except that I don't know whether (s)he still does this, and I don't think past misbehavior should permanently disqualify an editor. —RuakhTALK 19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)