Talk:醎

Definition

What does it mean? 71.66.97.228 02:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

"vulgar variant of 鹹" - Kangxi Zidian —suzukaze (t・c) 21:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't see a definition in the entry. 173.89.236.187 09:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Translingual definitions are being phased out, look at 醎#Chinese (or in this case 鹹#Chinese) —suzukaze (t・c) 09:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Where in either entry does it say "vulgar variant of 鹹"? If that is accura, it should be somewhere. 173.89.236.187 03:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

"vulgar variant of 鹹" - Kangxi Zidian —suzukaze (t・c) 21:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Kangxi Zidian: 醎: 俗鹹字

醎#Chinese: "This term, 醎, is a variant form of 鹹." —suzukaze (t・c) 01:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I have again searched both entries and not only does the phrase "vulgar variant of 鹹" not appear in either entry, the word "vulgar" does not appear in either entry either. 173.89.236.187 06:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Is the {{zh-see}} box not enough??? (also, I never said that "vulgar etc." appeared in either entry, but I did say that it is how Kangxi Zidian defines it) —suzukaze (t・c) 06:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, does "vulgar" mean "obscene" here, or just "uneducated"? If either is the case and it's not a simple case of a simplified version of a traditional character (developed by official language revision committees in mainland China following 1949), I think it is worth adding that information to the sentence that accompanies the box that redirects. 173.89.236.187 02:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

俗#Translingual: 2. vulgar, unrefined

The box already says that 醎 is a variant. I don't think that it needs any more clarification (it can't anyways, the text is hardwired into the code) —suzukaze (t・c) 02:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)