Request for verification
Last modified on 4 December 2009, at 13:28
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Rfv-sense —This comment was unsigned.
- Delete. It's actually pretty citeable using Usenet (;  or ; ), but I just don't think this is something we want. —RuakhTALK 19:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it is citeable. I don't like it because the subject is so encyclopaedic and fleeting (who will remember this game in five years, especially when it was never actually released and its developer no longer exists?), but then again we list abbreviations for many encyclopaedic subjects — albeit mostly less obscure. I abstain! Equinox ◑ 20:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I've added a few more senses for you to argue about! (Some will be more permanent than the Duke) Dbfirs 08:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- RFV failed, sense removed. —RuakhTALK 18:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)