Last modified on 5 June 2006, at 11:11


Is really the fact that the noun surprise can be used attributively something to warrant a separate definition? The third noun def could perhaps also be merged into the other two?--sanna 09:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I think the third definition should remain separate, because a feeling of surprise will often be translated differently from a surprising event. Kappa 11:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Return to "surprise" page.