Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2019-09/Qualifiers after terms in translation section

Qualifiers after terms in translation section edit

Voting on: Changing the use of {{qualifier}} in translation sections to always come after a term. This prevents the use of qualifiers to span multiple terms by affixing a ":" and helps keeping a common parsable format of the translation sections for external tools (e.g. Bilingual Dictionaries for Offline Use by Matthias).

Schedule:

Discussion:

Support edit

  1.   Support: I'm all for having consistent standards, and the added clarity of avoiding multi-term spanning looks like good design. Literal translations also (rightly) come after the term; which comes first? Stelio (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, term first, then transliteration, then literal translation, then qualifier. You correctly assumed that anything spanning multiple terms is something I want to get rid of because it is very hard to parse.--So9q (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support: This seems eminently sensible to me; at least off the top of my head, I can't devise any reasonable objections to this proposal. --Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 10:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support. Perhaps {{t}} and related templates could also be updated along the lines of {{synonyms}} to allow for built-in qualifier parameters (|q1=, |q2=, etc.). — SGconlaw (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support per above. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Jberkel 16:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

  1.   Oppose Too simplistic. A single solution doesn't fit all situations. --{{victar|talk}} 06:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you elaborate? פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain edit

  1.   Abstain The translation adder script prefers {{t}} + {{q}}, which is what this vote wants to enforce, but Template:q#Usage demonstrates {{q}} + {{l}} for us. —Suzukaze-c 22:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Abstain --Geographyinitiative (talk) 07:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Abstain. DonnanZ (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit

Passes 9–1–3 (90%). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]