Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former

Commons Guidelines edit

I took this from the Commons site:

  • inactive administrators may have their access removed. According to this policy, any sysop inactive on Commons for a full year will be desysoped. "Inactive" means no edits in the past 6 months and fewer than 50 edits in the last year. Inactive administrators may re-apply through the regular way

Just for your information. Cheers, --Stranger 23:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Desysopping edit

I was waiting until after 9/11/05 to bring the motion to desysop to the floor in order to include User:Ortonmc in the motion; but I see he has made two edits in the past week or so. Would someone e-mail him and just ask him if he wishes to remain a sysop? I don't have that access--long story. Thanks. --Stranger 23:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Equinox edit

How about Equinox? This user was an admin, then isn't one anymore. Where is he on this page?--77.249.94.236 21:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have added myself. HTH HAND! Equinox 21:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFDO discussion: August–October 2015 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I don't see much point in this, TBH --A230rjfowe (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Strong keep. It is history. --Dixtosa (talk) 09:20, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Keep, at worst harmless, at best could be referenced in debates about old edits and who had admin powers at the time of those edits. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Good ratio of possible utility to storage space, IMO. DCDuring TALK 18:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kept.​—msh210 (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Desysopping for inactivity edit

No admin logs edit

General inactivity edit

Return to the project page "Administrators/Former".