Wiktionary talk:Frequency lists/Korean 200
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Atitarev in topic RFDO discussion: January 2015
What is the source for this frequency list? All of the other frequency lists have at least a semblance of reliability. 68.49.113.16 00:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not a clue, but it seems to have been derived from some sort of automated wordlist generator run over a fairly small corpus of conversational Korean. If you're looking for something with more of a semblance of reliability, please try Wiktionary:Basic Korean Vocabulary List. -- Visviva 02:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
For such a small list, the appendix has too many non-lemma forms, some would not pass CFI, e.g. word + particle (다음에). @Wyang, TAKASUGI_Shinji Is it worth keeping? I'm not eager to fix it. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Deleted. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)