Category talk:English lexicons

Latest comment: 9 years ago by DCDuring in topic RFM discussion: September 2012–July 2014

RFM discussion: September 2012–July 2014

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This seems more clear than the rather vague 'lexicon' which the average user will probably not understand. We should probably rename Category:English etymologies to Category:English terms by etymology too, and Category:English parts of speech to Category:English terms by part of speech while we're at it. —CodeCat 17:20, 20 September 2012 (UTC) (Note: It's implied that the categories for other languages will be renamed, too) —CodeCat 17:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The existing name may obscure, but it is not vague, unlike the proposed name which is vague without using obscure words. DCDuring TALK 16:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Return to "English lexicons" page.