RFV discussion: October–November 2017 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv for etymology 2. Dokurrat (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Dokurrat: The information seems to come from here, but I'm not sure where ctext got the Mandarin pronunciation from. The Cantonese readings come from the Unihan database (which is quite unreliable). — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 12:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Justinrleung: Ummm, I see. I'm gonna remove the etym 2 in the entry. Dokurrat (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "㫤" page.