Talk:abus sexuel

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic abus sexuel

Deletion debate edit

 

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


abus sexuel edit

For the same reasons as I nominated sexual abuse. I see no evidence that this is anything more than 'abuse of a sexual nature' - I would welcome evidence to the contrary. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

keep. This is a set phrase in French, and not a very natural one (probably built from English?): abus is not normally used with this sense in French. It's very easy to find books or sites providing a definition, which is a proof that the term needs a definition. It should be kept, just as abus de position dominante should be included. Lmaltier 08:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Withdrawing nomination, no realistic chance of success. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


Return to "abus sexuel" page.