Talk:accorporate

Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche

I seems awkward to have an English non-entry above a Latin [actual] entry. Not awkward enough that I'll remove the non-entry (I suppose it serves its purpose of prompting people to look for quotations that would make it meet CFI), but odd. - -sche (discuss) 05:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: October 2011–March 2012

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Listed in Appendix:English dictionary-only terms, should not occur in main namespace -- Liliana 03:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 07:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "accorporate" page.