Talk:amercement royal
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Smurrayinchester in topic RFV discussion: February–July 2015
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Any non-mentions out there? Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. In the other order, royal amercement is attested, but is it SOP? What do you think, @Smurrayinchester? If not, we could restore and move (salvage) amercement royal. - -sche (discuss) 04:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but it does just seem to be "penalty imposed by the king". Smurrayinchester (talk) 07:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)