Talk:conversate
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Connel MacKenzie in topic conversate
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The word is converse. You can have a conversation, but you can't conversate. Jooge 20:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- “conversate” is now cited as a word in African American Vernacular English. Rod (A. Smith) 20:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep; I hear this word with some regularity. --EncycloPetey 20:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it is worth noting that a b.g.c. search doesn't show many uses but shows quite a few style-guide proscriptions. I did see a valid-looking adjective use from 1891, but we don't give any definition for that. --Connel MacKenzie 21:37, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- That adjective-looking cite is a mistake on b.g.c.'s part — a scanno, I guess, but not how I usually think of scannos — it results from the cutting off of the leftmost several-characters'-width. (b.g.c. got "conversate" from "convers[hyphen][linebreak]ation; the politics" by losing the "ation; th" part.) —RuakhTALK 01:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good catch, thanks. --Connel MacKenzie 07:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)