Talk:f*der

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Msh210 in topic Request for deletion

Request for deletion edit

 

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


We're certainly not short on things in Portuguese (or any language) that actually need doing. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein03:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

How is this any different than f**k? Nadando 03:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
If it were up to me, we wouldn't have that either. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein23:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm struggling to find a reason to delete it. If you see f*der you're unlikely to know what it means, so that's a reason to look it up. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Do you often read Portuguese? — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein13:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
No, do you? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Keep, it it can be cited to meet WT:CFI. I've found that in some older English texts, items like this sometimes appear that leave me initially baffled when I read them. If you came across "br—h" (which I can cite), would you have the slightest clue what it meant? Ideas about what words are obscene change over time, and so do the euphemistic forms. --EncycloPetey 04:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Keep as with f**k and per EP. What's br—h, by the way, EP? (Guess: breech.)​—msh210 23:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes. You can see the quote in question on the entry for breech. --EncycloPetey 23:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kept.​—msh210 16:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Return to "f*der" page.