Talk:flavor

Return to "flavor" page.

I propose that this page be amalgamated with /flavour/ and be under the /flavour/ title. --Zippanova 01:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I propose that the tag 'Commonwealth English' is removed as there is no such thing. PrivateWiddle 01:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep tidy.svg

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.


flavor

The Latin does not appear in any major dictionary I have checked, nor does it turn up on a search of Latin wikisource.

I think I have found a clue about this at [1].

That is not to say that I would defend the entry. DCDuring TALK 20:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The next breadcrumb, I think is "Lloyd's Encyclopedic Dictionary" 1895, published by the newspaper magnate, probably not a definitive source. I can't find the entry in question. DCDuring TALK 23:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
It is in my Latin dictionary - marked "NeoLatin - vary rare" SemperBlotto 22:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Which Latin dictionary is that? If you mean the electronic one you mentioned before, then I have not been impressed with what I've learned about it. It seems to have indiscriminately included words from numerous unnamed sources which therefore cannot be verified. --EncycloPetey 22:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
With no supporting citations after almost a year, I am removing the Latin section as having failed RfV. --EncycloPetey 18:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


Last modified on 20 May 2009, at 23:59