Talk:kriĉji

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

kriĉji

I have never seen this neologism before. Even its Wikipedia article on the Esperanto Wikipedia got removed many years ago, not sure why it is still here. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

I added one citation from Libera Folio. From what I am reading the first reference to it was in TEJO Tutmonde 2005 issue 2, which is durably archived; however I don't have a copy of this and thus cannot give the exact quote. Living in the United States I don't have much access to archives for Esperanto magazines, but I am hoping someone else can locate a copy. If not it's fine. Jan sewi (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

• RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 05:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)