Talk:mensk

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: March–May 2022

RFV discussion: March–May 2022

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Like hatel, it looks like this didn't survive the parlous journey from ME to ModE given its absence from EEBO, the EDD, and the OED, unless you count a phonetically altered form (mense in this case). Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 13:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed. While there are a handful of cites (on citations page) that extend past 1500, this does look like it died out with Middle English. Kiwima (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "mensk" page.